G.R. No. 170257

RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. D E C I S I O N

[ G.R. No. 170257. September 07, 2011 ] 672 Phil. 514

THIRD DIVISION

[ G.R. No. 170257. September 07, 2011 ]

RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. D E C I S I O N

MENDOZA, J.:

This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 seeking to set aside the July 27, 2005 Decision[1] and October 26, 2005 Resolution[2] of the Court of Tax Appeals En Banc (CTA-En Banc) in C.T.A. E.B. No. 83 entitled “Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.”

THE FACTS

Petitioner Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC) is a corporation engaged in general banking operations.  It seasonably filed its Corporation Annual Income Tax Returns for Foreign Currency Deposit Unit for the calendar years 1994 and 1995.[3] On August 15, 1996, RCBC received Letter of Authority No. 133959 issued by then Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) Liwayway Vinzons-Chato, authorizing a special audit team to examine the books of accounts and other accounting records for all internal revenue taxes from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1995.[4] On January 23, 1997, RCBC executed two Waivers of the Defense of Prescription Under the Statute of Limitations of the National Internal Revenue Code covering the internal revenue taxes due for the years 1994 and 1995, effectively extending the period of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to assess up to December 31, 2000.[5] Subsequently, on January 27, 2000, RCBC received a Formal Letter of Demand together with Assessment Notices from the BIR for the following deficiency tax assessments:[6]

Particulars

Basic Tax

Interest

Compromise Penalties

Total